User talk:Bouquet

At Wikipedia we like people with a sense of humor. I think. --Austrian 00:36, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

;)

Samsara (talk • contribs) 22:43, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

I know who you are...you may have some people fooled but I'm not one of them. If you recreate the image, I'll simply delete it again. Keep your adolescent harassment confined to the ED website.--MONGO 21:54, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon? I don't know if you're aware but there is a policy called 'assume good faith' at wikipedia. Your above comment is not only slightly threatening, but also against that common policy. --Bouquet 01:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is this? MONGO, this isn't a mafia! Leaving threatening/intimidating comments on people's talk pages is not cool, and reflects especially badly on the WIkipedia community when done to an infrequent editor. Psycho Master (Karwynn) 15:42, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mediacrat. It should take you little more than 30 seconds to figure out who this is an abusive sleeper-sockpuppet of. Hipocrite - «Talk» 16:11, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks. So anyway, go ahead and assume good faith and don't bully people, regardless of your suspicions of sockpuppetry. I see no link between Jameth (if that's who you mean) and this guy other than the fact that both take interest in the ED article. Psycho Master (Karwynn) 16:49, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only wikipedia account I have. Feel free to CheckUser me. I am not a sock puppet of anyone. That all happened in Dec 2004. I got a wikipedia account like a year after that whole thing had beed long forgotten. Also, I don't see why you think I'm a sockpuppet when I haven't done a damn thing wrong. AT ALL. --Bouquet 17:24, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apology

Hi. I apologize for coming across as angry at Talk:Encyclopædia Dramatica. I'm a bit puzzled that you got that impression, because I'm not at all angry, and was really just trying to point out the weakness in how that poll was formatted. I had edited down from a substantially longer post, so maybe I managed to leave a message that sounded impatient or bitchy. I really just meant that the poll was set up as if its purpose were to decide between A and B, not as if it's purpose were to gather information and generate creative solutions. -GTBacchus^(talk) 01:49, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It is ok. I agree with your point re: that section, it should have a different tone. I am just sort of gunshy over the whole ED thing when I reverted what I thought was a simple mistake and got chewed out for it. I've tried my best to encourage civility and coolheadedness on the issue as a whole, but haven't had much luck. The sheer numbers of overly passionate people prevents any rational dialogue from coming forth. It's a shame. --Bouquet 07:23, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]